| Why Use GartnerProducts & ServicesAnalysts & ConsultantsEvents About |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blog Alert
When a new post is published,
we'll deliver it to your inbox.
Search The Blog
Categories
Archives
Recommended Links
Contact
To learn more, please contact:
Gartner Office: + 1 203 964 0096 sitefeedback@gartner.com help@gartner.com Contact Us Form Worldwide General Contacts |
20 October, 2006 01:22 PM EST Vista in January: It's Looking More Likely, But Is It Responsible?
Posted By: Brian Gammage, VP Distinguished Analyst
Following last Friday's announcement that Vista is on schedule, it appears that Microsoft has made much faster progress than many (including Gartner) had expected in getting its next Windows OS ready for release. Given the patchy nature of the Beta releases we saw earlier this year, this is a noteworthy achievement, and it says much about the company's determination to meet the deadline it set for itself in March. COMMENTS
23 October, 2006 05:41 PM EST Pradeep
It looks like you are just being critical of Microsoft to cover up your failed prediction. I don’t understand the necessity of such a report now. Neither Microsoft is going to postpone the release date nor OEMs are going to pressure Microsoft to announce a new release date. Don’t you think Microsoft took account of these factors before it set a release date in January. This seems very childish.
24 October, 2006 04:10 AM EST john
why is Gartner sooo anti-MS...perhaps, no advertising revenue from MS?
24 October, 2006 11:40 AM EST Brian, so what makes you think that you have enough understanding or credibility to make any comments/predictions on Microsoft and people should believe what you say? You had to eat your own words on the Vista release and every comment that Gartner makes is so obviously negative that I am pretty sure that there is some hidden agenda here... Why don't you just stop playing games and come clean about it?
27 October, 2006 09:57 AM EST Neil
Whilst I'm sure this debate about release dates is of interest to the PC industry, as business consumers of this technology, it would be good to concentrate on the "what" and "how" rather than the "when". For most large organisations, the if the when drifts by 6 to 12 months then that's not a big issue as it can take that long, as a minimum, to implement a new desktop OS.
What is Vista bringing to the Corporate market? What is different that can't largely be done via careful application of the settings in AD? What is the cost of roll-out vs staying on XP (or in many organisation's cases, W2K), should we roll out as we replace hardware or wait for Vista + 1 as a big bang approach - what are the pros and cons? Will we see the return on the expense of upgrading all our hardware to cope with the new OS (I understand it won't ship on CD - it's too big)? Should we ditch all this thick client stuff and invest heavily in Citrix / SoftGrid to get away from the desktop management pain? Lets concentrate on these issues - they're the ones that matter to Gartner's typical Window user communities. 01 November, 2006 07:44 PM EST Vitnu
You can order the software on CD or DVD if you are a Volume Licensing customer -- you set your CD or DVD preferences on the MVLS web site.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||